1. United States
2. N.Y.
3. Letter

The Social Security Administration's new requirement for in-person identity verification is concerning, as it could impose significant barriers for many recipients, especially those in rural areas or with mobility limitations. Making accessibility to crucial benefits more difficult seems counterproductive. While fraud prevention is important, there may be better solutions that don't hinder public access and strain agency resources. I urge you to reconsider this policy change and prioritize measures that enhance service, not restrict it. Social Security is a vital safety net, and any reforms should aim to strengthen it for all eligible Americans in a fair and equitable manner. Please explore alternatives that balance security with accessibility to preserve this essential program.