1. United States
2. Pa.
3. Letter

The EPA's consideration to roll back regulations on radiation exposure is deeply concerning and poses grave risks to public health and safety. The harmful effects of radiation exposure, even at low levels, are well-documented and supported by overwhelming scientific evidence. Any relaxation of protective measures would needlessly endanger countless lives and communities. The devastating consequences of nuclear testing in the Pacific underscore the importance of stringent radiation safeguards. Tragically, cancer rates among affected populations remain alarmingly high, with projections indicating that the worst is yet to come. The anguish and suffering inflicted upon these communities serve as a sobering reminder of the imperative to uphold and strengthen radiation exposure protections, not dismantle them. Disregarding established scientific consensus and prioritizing fringe theories that downplay radiation risks would be a reckless and unethical decision. It would represent a gross dereliction of the EPA's duty to safeguard public welfare and environmental integrity. Prioritizing narrow interests over empirical evidence and human well-being is antithetical to the principles of responsible governance. I urge you to reject any attempts to weaken radiation exposure regulations. Protecting the health and safety of all citizens, present and future, must take precedence over any misguided efforts to undermine well-established scientific principles and hard-won environmental protections. The consequences of such regulatory rollbacks would be severe and far-reaching, jeopardizing the well-being of countless individuals and communities. Upholding robust radiation exposure safeguards is a moral and ethical imperative that cannot be compromised.