1. United States
2. S.D.
3. Letter

The potential elimination of FEMA could have severe consequences for South Dakota's ability to respond to disasters and emergencies. South Dakota has relied heavily on FEMA funding in recent years, receiving over $300 million from 2010 to 2015 alone. This federal assistance was crucial in recovery efforts following major events like the 2010 flooding and the COVID-19 pandemic. Without FEMA support, South Dakota may struggle to adequately fund emergency response and disaster relief measures. The state's emergency fund often requires backfilling at each legislative session, indicating a dependence on federal aid and reimbursements. Local governments would face a significant financial burden as well, with cities like Vermillion and Canton unable to complete critical infrastructure repairs without the 75% FEMA contribution. While proposals aim to increase state responsibilities, South Dakota's history demonstrates the necessity of robust federal partnerships and resources during crises. Eliminating FEMA risks leaving communities vulnerable and underprepared when disasters strike. A comprehensive plan outlining alternative funding sources and streamlined response procedures is imperative to ensure South Dakotans remain protected without jeopardizing the state's limited budget.