1. United States
2. Pa.
3. Letter

It is deeply concerning to see a qualified and respected official like Dr. Peter Marks forced to resign from his position at the FDA due to differing views on vaccination. As the top vaccine regulator, Dr. Marks has played a crucial role in ensuring vaccine safety and efficacy through rigorous scientific review. His abrupt resignation over disagreements with Secretary Kennedy about vaccine misinformation is a troubling development that could undermine public confidence in vaccines approved by the FDA. Removing experienced scientists from key oversight roles risks politicizing the vaccine approval process and poses a danger to public health. Extensive research has proven vaccines to be safe and effective, saving millions of lives. Sidelining experts who prioritize scientific evidence threatens to erode trust in this critical field. Maintaining an objective, evidence-based approach at the FDA is vital to safeguarding the robust standards that have made vaccines an extraordinary public health achievement. It is imperative that the FDA's leadership respects the scientific process and avoids propagating misinformation that could dissuade people from getting life-saving vaccinations. Qualified medical professionals with unwavering commitment to scientific integrity must be empowered to make decisions free from political interference. Restoring public faith in institutions like the FDA requires elevating expertise over rhetoric that contradicts established facts. Protecting this scientific credibility is essential for an effective pandemic response and broader public health efforts.