1. United States
2. Iowa
3. Letter

I am writing to express my strong opposition to Senate File 360, which seeks to ban mRNA vaccines in Iowa. This legislation is not only scientifically unsound but also threatens public health and restricts individuals' rights to protect themselves from serious infectious diseases. 1 Scientific Evidence Supports mRNA Vaccines
mRNA vaccine technology has been rigorously studied for decades and has undergone extensive clinical trials before receiving FDA approval. The COVID-19 vaccines developed by Pfizer and Moderna have demonstrated high efficacy in preventing severe illness and death while undergoing continuous safety monitoring. The claim that these vaccines should be banned ignores overwhelming scientific consensus and undermines advancements in medical innovation. 2 Public Health Consequences
Banning mRNA vaccines would put Iowa residents at increased risk for infectious diseases, weakening our ability to respond to future outbreaks. The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the critical role these vaccines play in protecting vulnerable populations, reducing hospitalizations, and alleviating strain on our healthcare system. Restricting access to a proven public health tool would only lead to unnecessary illness and loss of life. 3 The Right to Protect One’s Health
Every individual should have the right to make informed decisions about their health based on medical expertise and personal circumstances. Preventing access to safe and effective vaccines violates this fundamental right and sets a dangerous precedent for government overreach into personal healthcare choices. I urge you to oppose Senate File 360 and support policies that prioritize public health, scientific integrity, and individual freedoms. Iowa should be a leader in evidence-based decision-making, not a state that disregards medical advancements to the detriment of its residents. Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to your response.