1. United States
2. Fla.
3. Letter

The proposed ceasefire in the Black Sea raises concerns as it appears to disproportionately benefit Russia at Ukraine's expense. While opening agricultural trade is positive, the lack of protection for Ukraine's port infrastructure and the continued blockade of Mykolaiv port undermine Ukraine's vital economic interests. This arrangement seems to prioritize Russian demands over Ukraine's urgent security needs. By allowing Russia's naval forces closer access without ensuring Ukraine's coastal defenses, the agreement jeopardizes Ukraine's hard-won maritime trade corridor. This lifeline has boosted exports nearly 60% compared to the restrictive previous grain deal. Metallurgical exports have rebounded, supporting a key industry. Relinquishing such gains without reciprocal safeguards is detrimental. The exclusion of regional allies like Romania and Bulgaria from negotiations is also troubling. As Black Sea nations impacted by Russian aggression, their perspectives should be represented to address shared security concerns. Overall, this cease-fire prioritizes Russian interests at Ukraine's expense, lacking critical provisions to protect Ukraine's economic arteries and sovereignty. Therefore, a request is made to reconsider this agreement. Any ceasefire must sufficiently address Ukraine's defensive requirements, particularly safeguarding port operations from Russian strikes. It should also mandate the unblocking of Mykolaiv port. Meaningful concessions from Russia, not just sanctions relief, are needed to make this a truly mutually beneficial arrangement. Continued exclusion of regional partners undermines cooperation vital for regional security.