1. United States
2. N.Y.
3. Letter

I understand your strong feelings about Attorney General Pam Bondi's actions at the Justice Department, which many view as overtly political and a weaponization of the DOJ to advance Trump's agenda. However, accusing her of treason is an extremely serious allegation that requires concrete evidence of betraying the United States. Instead, I would suggest focusing the message on the specific concerning actions laid out, such as: Bondi has swiftly aligned the Justice Department with Trump's political interests, rather than maintaining its independence as she pledged. Her directives appear aimed at protecting Trump and going after his perceived enemies, like ordering reviews of prosecutions against him while dropping charges against his allies. She has removed dozens of officials deemed insufficiently loyal to Trump. Guardrails separating DOJ operations from White House interference have been lowered. These moves compromise the Justice Department's integrity and nonpartisan enforcement of laws. They represent a disturbing politicization undermining its mission. Bondi must be held accountable for these actions that damage public trust in federal law enforcement and the justice system. However, accusing her of the capital crime of treason raises the risk of appearing hyperbolic rather than substantive. The factual concerns about her leadership honestly portrayed are compelling enough to warrant a full investigation into her conduct.