1. United States
2. Kan.
3. Letter

The proposed constitutional amendment to directly elect Supreme Court justices and abolish the Supreme Court Nominating Commission is a concerning measure that threatens the independence of the judiciary in Kansas. The current merit-based selection process helps ensure judges are chosen based on their qualifications and legal expertise rather than partisan politics or special interests. Allowing direct election of judges would inevitably inject more money into judicial races and make judges beholden to campaign donors and voter bases, compromising their ability to act as fair and impartial arbiters of the law. Furthermore, the Supreme Court Nominating Commission plays a vital role in vetting potential judges and making recommendations based on professional credentials. Abolishing this body would remove an important check on the governor's appointment power and could lead to more partisan, ideologically-driven nominations. An independent judiciary free from undue political influence is a cornerstone of our democratic system of government. I urge you to vote against SCR 1611 and maintain the current merit selection process for choosing Supreme Court justices in Kansas. Preserving the autonomy and impartiality of the state's highest court is critical for upholding the rule of law and protecting the rights of all Kansans.