1. United States
2. Calif.
3. Letter

Governor Gavin Newsom’s executive order mandating that all state employees return to in-person work four days per week, effective July 1, 2025, is a regressive policy that disregards the demonstrated benefits of remote work. Throughout the pandemic, state employees effectively maintained operations and services while working remotely, showcasing increased productivity and enhanced work-life balance. Forcing a return to the office not only undermines these gains but also imposes unnecessary financial burdens on workers, who will now face increased commuting costs amid rising inflation and high gas prices. Furthermore, this blanket mandate fails to consider the diverse nature of state jobs and the varying effectiveness of remote work across different roles. While certain positions may benefit from in-person collaboration, many others have proven to be equally, if not more, effective in a remote setting. By imposing a one-size-fits-all approach, the administration disregards the flexibility that has been crucial in attracting and retaining a talented workforce. This inflexibility could lead to decreased employee morale and potential challenges in recruitment, especially as other employers continue to offer remote work options. Moreover, the anticipated influx of employees commuting to urban centers like Sacramento raises concerns about increased traffic congestion and environmental impact. The reduction in remote work could reverse the environmental benefits gained during the period of widespread telecommuting, such as decreased greenhouse gas emissions and improved air quality. Instead of reverting to outdated work models, the state should embrace the evolution of the workplace by promoting flexible arrangements that benefit both employees and the broader community.